Blogs torial Blog | Wird wondermags die Wunderwaffe für Self-Publisher? - torial blog | torial Mithilfe von wondermags können auch weniger technikaffine Autoren und Journalisten künftig mit ihren Inhalten Geld verdienen. Nachdem der Content eigenhändig fertiggestellt und das eMagazin veröffentlicht ist, kümmert sich wondermags um die Distribution und Monetarisierung. Das klingt fast zu schön, um wahr zu sein. wondermags soll nach den Plänen der Macher zum Allheilmittel der Self-Publisher werden. torial: Wie seid ihr auf die Idee mit wondermags gekommen? Stojan Rudan: Vor zwei Jahren habe ich mir einen bekannten Fitness-Titel als digitales Magazin für das iPad heruntergeladen. - Was wäre, wenn es eine Plattform oder ein System gäbe, wo man richtige, interaktive und multimediale eMagazines erstellen kann und nicht diese starren PDF-Dinger? - Was wäre, wenn Jeder (nicht nur Design-Profis und Agenturen) diese Plattform kostenfrei nutzen und darüber ohne Design-Kenntnisse eMagazines erstellen und diese für Tablets publizieren könnte? 1. 2. torial: Welche Features hat der Webeditor?
Pinstagram! How Two Friends Merged Pinterest, Instagram in Two Days What would happen if two of the digital world's hottest startups, Pinterest and Instagram, were mashed into one? Two friends decided to find out, in a weekend coding adventure that began as a joke. Pek Pongpaet and Brandon Leonardo were discussing how many startups are pitched to VC firms with phrases such as "We're an X for Y, like an AirBnB for dogs," Pongpaet told Mashable. The duo realized a "Pinterest for Instagram" would be the most extreme example, and thus Pinstagram was born. "Over the weekend I started hacking away at it," Pek says. After connecting your Instagram account, you view your photo stream in the waterfall layout Pinterest is known for, and has since spread across the web. For Pek, Pinstagram fills a big void in the Instagram ecosystem — an easy way to browse your photos on a desktop browser. "This is the perfect interface for Instagram for me," Pek says, noting he uses Instagram more through Pinstagram than ever before.
Opentape # Yumpu > wie ISSUU, Basis kostenlos Seven Ways To Be A Better Pinner Hi. I'm Jen, and I'm addicted to Pinterest. If you've also pinned the Kool-Aid, then you know Pinterest is a fun and easy way to visually catalog the things you love online. However, as the controversy over Pinterests's Terms of Service the other month showed, there actually are wrong ways to pin - ways that could even potentially get you in legal trouble. (And even if they don't, they're not very nice.) 1) Pick The Right Picture This sounds like a no-brainer, but sometimes - particularly with things like DIY tutorials or self-help articles - people tend to make some...well...odd choices: As a general rule, just look for a picture that's as self-explanatory as possible. For example, I found this pin: Right next to this pin. Which would *you* click? 2) Pin From The Source This is the most common mistake I see on Pinterest, probably because most pinners have no idea they're doing anything wrong. The beauty of Pinterest is that, when used correctly, it directly rewards original content creators.
Get Smarter Here Creating interactive maps with Prezi by Ned Potter on Prezi Six Degrees of Wikipedia Ever heard of the game Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon? If you haven't, it works like this: Every actor gets a Kevin Bacon number. Kevin Bacon has a Kevin Bacon number of 0, actors who were in a movie with Kevin Bacon get a Kevin Bacon number of 1, actors who were in a movie with someone who has a Kevin Bacon number 1 get a 2, and so on (Everybody always gets the smallest number possible, so if you were in a film with two people, one with a 4 and one with a 6, your Kevin Bacon number would be 5). The same idea could apply to the articles Wikipedia. Several people were asking about what's known as the "diameter" of Wikipedia, that is, the distance between the two articles furthest apart (the longest shortest path if that makes any sense to you). Another question that came up was why I chose the "departure center" (the article from which it's easiest to get anywhere else), rather than the "arrival center" (the article that it's easiest to get to). The complete results are available here.