Carte interactive de la protection des données personnelles dans le monde Carte interactive de la protection des données personnelles dans le monde Voici une carte interactive de la protection des données personnelles dans le monde. Elle pour objectif de bien comprendre le niveau de protection et les différentes lois appliquées dans chaque pays afin de vous aider sur le process de mise en conformité au RGPD. La carte n’est pas encore complètement finie. Cette carte comporte ou comportera les éléments suivants: Le niveau de protection de chaque paysLe titre de la loi ou du projet de loiLes liens vers les documents de loi de chaque paysLes pays membres de l’AFAPDP (l’Association francophone des autorités de protection des données personnelles)Le site web de l’autorité de conformité et son adresse postaleDes remarques importantes sur les lois appliquées Merci pour votre compréhension et n’hésitez pas à me faire votre retour WordPress: J'aime chargement…
Guide to online dating behaviours | Life and style It’s a truism of modern dating that no one knows what they are doing anymore. As technology has exploded our capacity to find potential mates and take them to tapas bars with outsized wine glasses, we’ve all had to relearn our sexual “moves” from first principles, like stone age hunter-gatherers suddenly asked to perform credit default swaps. Yet what’s becoming apparent is that we all don’t know what we’re doing in remarkably consistent ways. These quirks – and the rules formulated by a panoply of breathless dating gurus who promise to help you navigate them – have required a new language. Ghosting Some suggest that ghosting is a defining millennial act. Ghosting is in lockstep with the times because it is entirely driven by new technology’s capacity to anonymise. Rather than explain in a series of text messages that they are a desiccated husk of a human, the ghoster simply puts down the phablet and is never heard from again. Slow fading You should pity them. Cuffing season Deep like
Getting your data out of Tinder is hard. It shouldn't be | Paul-Olivier Dehaye | Technology When a journalist approached me to help her get a copy of her personal data from Tinder, I knew this would be a good story. Judith Duportail had read my work researching the use of psychometrics during the US elections and the Brexit referendum. Duportail knew that Tinder computes a “desirability score” for their users: Tinder’s CEO had told another journalist their score, emphasising how complex and advanced its algorithm supposedly was. Curiosity piqued, Duportail wondered whether Tinder would tell her, or any other user who asked, their score, and how it was computed. Any European company has in theory the obligation to disclose the personal data it holds about any individual who asks them Companies even have to disclose the “logic of the processing” of that data. These rights can be very powerful tools for the democratic and distributed oversight of the data economy, but they have unfortunately fallen into misuse.
Net 'not ready' for vital security update Image copyright felixR A plan to update the security around some of the net's core address books has been delayed. Net administrative body Icann put its plans on hold after it emerged that some ISPs and large firms were not ready to make the change. It feared that tens of millions would lose net access if the change went ahead as planned on 11 October. Icann said it was working with ISPs to update software and ensure everyone is ready to switch next year. "It would be irresponsible to proceed with the roll [out] after we have identified these new issues that could adversely affect its success and could adversely affect the ability of a significant number of end users," said Goran Marby, head of Icann. Since early 2017, Icann (The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) has been preparing to update the cryptographic keys used to ensure that information about web domain names can be trusted. Icann has been distributing new keys to DNS SEC users for months.
La protection des données en Europe – Oxalia Data Protection La protection des données en Europe L’application prochaine en mai 2018 du « RGPD », le Règlement Général relatif à la Protection des Données à caractère personnel (ou GDPR en anglais), entraine la publication de nombreux articles çà et là sur la toile. Beaucoup d’entre eux évoquent une « révolution » tandis que d’autres, plus mesurés, parlent « d’évolution ». Comme souvent, la vérité est entre les deux. Le RGPD est principalement constitutif d’évolutions et pour certains points constitutif de « révolutions ». Peu de choses sont réellement nouvelles dans ce règlement. Voilà une bonne occasion de jeter un œil à notre tableau comparatif des 28 « CNIL » européennes. Quelles sont leurs possibilités de contrôles et de sanctions ? France Allemagne Autriche Belgique Bulgarie Chypre Croatie Danemark Espagne Estonie Finlande Grèce Hongrie Irlande Italie Lettonie Lituanie Luxembourg Malte Pays-Bas Pologne Portugal République Tchèque Roumanie Royaume-Uni Slovaquie Slovénie Suède Partagez cet article ! LinkedinEmail Related Posts
Sex toy company admits to recording users' remote sex sessions, calls it a 'minor bug' | The Verge I have some news: the Internet of Things is a mess. A hacked refrigerator sounds slightly scary, but a vibrator-controlling app that records all your sex sounds and stores them on your phone without your knowledge? That's way worse. Today, a Reddit user pointed out that Hong Kong-based sex toy company Lovense's remote control vibrator app (Lovense Remote) recorded a use session without their knowledge. A user claiming to represent Lovense responded and called this recording a "minor bug" that only affects Android users. This isn't Lovense's first security flub. All of this is to say that if you're going to purchase connected sex toys, do your research. Correction 4:26 PM ET: This article previously stated that Lovense created the We-Vibe vibrator.
The information banks keep about you and your spending and how it's used - ABC Life Remember the last time you opened a bank account or applied for a credit card? You probably gathered up your paperwork and handed over your name, address and payslips, hoping to be approved. Given what we willingly provide them, you'd expect banks to have a certain level of information about us. But you'd likely be surprised to find out exactly how much they really know, says Professor Dimity Kingsford Smith, a corporate regulation expert from the University of New South Wales. "They know our gender, they know our income, they know where we're employed, they know who our kids are, they know what we spend our money on," she says. "[And] they could make a pretty good guess about how much tax we pay." That's because every time we swipe a credit card, we're handing across more information on our spending patterns — what products and services we buy, how much we're spending and how frequently. This makes the banks one of the few organisations with such a full picture of our personal information.
Fake website fools Equifax staff Image copyright EPA Credit rating firm Equifax has apologised after it mistakenly directed some customers to an imposter website via its Twitter page. The firm recently disclosed a data breach affecting more than 143 million people, and set up a new website to share information with customers. But it mistakenly tweeted the wrong web address several times, leading some customers to a fake website. One security researcher told the BBC it was a "massive faux-pas". Following its data breach, Equifax set up a new website - equifaxsecurity2017.com - to let people find out more information. The website also let people register for a credit monitoring service, by entering personal details into a form. Many security researchers said Equifax should have hosted this information on its main website - equifax.com - rather than setting up a new one. They pointed out that the new web address looked like one a scammer might set up to try to fool victims. Image copyright Twitter.com/Equifax
GDPR Material and Territorial Scopes Posted by Tara Taubman-Bassirian on February 8, 2018. The new EU General Data Regulation will apply from May of this year. The GDPR contains rules concerning the protection of natural persons when their personal data are processed and rules on the free movement of personal data. The new regulation is not revolutionary but an evolution from the previous Data Protection Act 1998 that needed an update taking account of the evolution pf new technologies such as social media. The regulation has lately created a big buzz due to much higher financial sanctions. Many whom heard of, have been shaken by the perspective of the high fines of 20 Million € or 4% global turnover, whichever higher. As stressed in Article 1(1) GDPR. Article 1(2) GDPR provides that the GDPR seeks to protect fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons and, more specifically, their right to the protection of personal data. Therefore, are excluded legal persons, deceased unless member state ruling otherwise. 2.
a girl’s guide to surviving social media after a break-up "Everywhere I turn he's right there. I feel like I can't escape." This is a conversation most of us have had with friends who have just come out of relationships. Romance is brutal, relationships can burn out slowly or end abruptly and pulling yourself back together after they do is never easy. But there is one thing, always present, which affects the process more than we give it credit for. Your phone might be face down on the table if present company is lucky, but it's more likely standing to attention by your elbow or gripped in one hand. We continue to underestimate the actual impact of the culture of surveillance and self-surveillance created by social media, but we are all victim to its repercussions. Imagine for a moment that you've fallen asleep and woken up inside your Instagram account. Social media after a break-up is a minefield -- if you aren't going to delete it make sure you're aware of it.