background preloader

Analysis 2020 – Top Tools for Learning 2020

Analysis 2020 – Top Tools for Learning 2020
The Top 200 Tools for Learning 2020 was compiled by Jane Hart from 2,369 votes from 45 countries in the 14th annual survey and was published on 1 September 2020. 59% of respondents came from companies, businesses and non-profit making organisations whilst 41% worked in education (although only 6% taught in K12 schools so the tools predominately reflect the situation in higher and adult education). The survey took place at an unprecedented time following a period of lockdown where remote working and remote education was the norm, so the list(s) provide a unique look into how learning is being enabled and supported in these times. Here are my observations on this year’s list(s) together with some infographics that visualise the state of play as well as some thoughts on what this means for the “new normal” for personal learning, workplace learning and education. Here are 10 general observations on the Top 200 Tools ranking Personal Learning in 2020 Workplace Learning in 2020 Education in 2020

https://www.toptools4learning.com/analysis-2020/

Related:  NUMERIQUEWebové aplikace v informačním vzděláváníOnline tresnak. Gestores de aulaTeletrabajoDigital Humanities

About Alchetron We live in a digital age driven by information. With information being the catalyst that drives everything from education to business, we need that data fast, accessible, and displayed in a way that makes it easy to digest, share, consume and implement. Yet, little has been done since the days of old encyclopedias to evolve the way in which multi-format information can be quickly and uniquely accessed from one central hub. Until now. Alchetron combines the basic premise of an online encyclopedia with innovative and forward-thinking features that provide their users with an immersive, social and multi-media rich experience with each and every search query. Both Non-Digital & Digital encyclopedias are outdated, slow, disorganized, and provide only one format of information to their users.

Tech and me: an autoethnographic account of digital literacy as an identity performance Adams, T. E., Jones, S. H. & Ellis, C. (2015) Autoethnography, Oxford University Press, NewYork, NY. Bali, M., et al., (2015) ‘What makes a cMOOC Community Endure?

Get a master degree in digital humanities online - I chose to study Digital Humanities because I was curious about the programme. I have a bachelor’s degree in Library and Information Studies and wanted to expand my knowledge by studying more. Digital Humanities felt like a natural continuation for me since I’m interested in cultural heritage, digital transformation, and digital preservation. Elin appreciates the fact that there are so many students on the programme with different academic backgrounds, from different countries. - The fact that it is an online programme has meant that teachers, guest lecturers and students participate from all over the world, which contributes with a very broad perspective to the programme. Digital humanities is an interdisciplinary field and this is evident on the programme.

The Emergence of the Digital Humanities The past decade has seen a profound shift in our collective understanding of the digital network. What was once understood to be a transcendent virtual reality is now experienced as a ubiquitous grid of data that we move through and interact with every day, raising new questions about the social, locative, embodied, and object-oriented nature of our experience in the networked world. In The Emergence of the Digital Humanities, Steven E. Jones examines this shift in our relationship to digital technology and the ways that it has affected humanities scholarship and the academy more broadly. The Open Access version of this book, available at has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 license.

The Emergence of the Digital Humanities (Open Access) The past decade has seen a profound shift in our collective understanding of the digital network. What was once understood to be a transcendent virtual reality is now experienced as a ubiquitous grid of data that we move through and interact with every day, raising new questions about the social, locative, embodied, and object-oriented nature of our experience in the networked world. In The Emergence of the Digital Humanities, Steven E. Jones examines this shift in our relationship to digital technology and the ways that it has affected humanities scholarship and the academy more broadly.

Sarah Pink - Digital Ethnography Research Centre Sarah Pink is design anthropologist, researcher, consultant and thought leader, whose work focuses on scholarship and intervention in the fields of technology design, digital technologies in everyday life and design for wellbeing. She is currently Professor of Design and Emerging Technologies at Monash University, where she is also Director of the interdisciplinary Emerging Technology Research Lab, spanning Monash Art, Design and Architecture (MADA) and Faculty of Information Technology. Prior to this Sarah was a Distinguished Professor in Design and Media Ethnography at RMIT University and from 2016 -2017 DERC’s Director.

UCL Centre for Digital Humanities In addition to the full Master's programme, the following short courses in Digital Humanities are also offered by the Department of Information Studies. Certificate in Digital Humanities This is a very flexible programme for anyone looking to extend their skill set, particularly for CPD. Students registered for the Certificate must complete four modules from our DH core and options list as agreed with the Programme Director. The length of time taken depends on the student's circumstances (they may be working full-time or using this programme to complement other studies) and can range from a single term to a maximum of two years. The course unit value is 60 credits or 24 ECTS which are transferable in the UK and EU.

China Biographical Database Project (CBDB) Social network analysis (SNA) provides an alternative to the factor-based approach in L. Stone's discussion of prosopography. Charles Wetherell writes: “Conceptualizing community as collections of personal relationships … provides historians with a blueprint for evaluating when, how and why people in the past used kin and non-kin in the course of their lives. The findings of social network analysts that people need and seek emotional and economic support of different kinds, from different kinds of people, suggest new analytical imperatives.

Aquesta web també us pot anar bé per a fer la proposta de quines eines hi ha al mercat que ens puguin servir per ensenyar i aprendre. I com les podem categoritzar... by arubiocarbo Nov 29

Related:  Hybrid learning