I Love Marketing A Code of Conduct for Effective Rational Discussion — Limbicnutrition Weblog The Fallibility Principle When alternative positions on any disputed issue are under review, each participant in the discussion should acknowledge that possibly none of the positions presented is deserving of acceptance and that, at best, only one of them is true or the most defensible position. Therefore, it is possible that thorough examination of the issue will reveal that one’s own initial position is a false or indefensible one. The Truth-Seeking Principle Each participant should be committed to the task of earnestly searching for the truth or at least the most defensible position on the issue at stake. The Clarity Principle The formulations of all positions, defences, and attacks should be free of any kind of linguistic confusion and clearly separated from other positions and issues. The Burden of Proof Principle The burden of proof for any position usually rests on the participant who sets forth the position. The Principle of Charity The Relevance Principle The Acceptability Principle
Attacking Faulty Reasoning Attacking Faulty Reasoning[1] is a textbook on logical fallacies by T. Edward Damer that has been used for many years in a number of college courses on logic, critical thinking, argumentation, and philosophy. It explains 60 of the most commonly committed fallacies. The five fallacy categories[edit] The text also sets forth 12 principles that constitute a "Code of Conduct for Effective Discussion." References[edit] See also[edit] Los 10 mejores bares para ir de a 2 Una cosa es salir con amigos y otra muy diferente es salir en pareja. Con amigos te podés juntar en cualquier pizzería a tomar birra y va a estar todo bien. Pero si salís con un chico o una chica, debés saber muy bien hacia dónde apuntás. No hace falta que vayas a un lugar caro, o demasiado exclusivo. A continuación, Planeta JOY te propone 10 lugares para ir de a dos. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. FUENTE: Homero ya fue a un bar,¿y vos?