The Myers & Briggs Foundation - My MBTI® Results Learning about your personality type may begin with something very small, maybe one key insight. As your interest and knowledge grows, you can then explore your personality more deeply and how you best like to communicate and interact with others. During a basic MBTI® feedback session, you receive a profile report of your MBTI results. MBTI reports tell you your preference for each of four pairs: Extraversion or Introversion E or I Sensing or Intuition S or N Thinking or Feeling T or F Judging or Perceiving J or P The four preferences together make up your whole type. When you receive your MBTI profile, you might not agree with it. Sometimes circumstances of your life can lead you to answer the questions on the MBTI instrument so that your reported MBTI type does not reflect your true preferences. Occasionally, even after going through the steps to choose your best-fit type, you may remain uncertain about your MBTI preferences. MBTI reports tell you your preference for each of four pairs:
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Model of personality types A chart with descriptions of each Myers–Briggs personality type and the four dichotomies central to the theory. In personality typology, the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is an introspective self-report questionnaire indicating differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. The test attempts to assign a value to each of four categories: introversion or extraversion, sensing or intuition, thinking or feeling, and judging or perceiving. One letter from each category is taken to produce a four-letter test result, such as "INTP" or "ESFJ".[2][3] The MBTI was constructed by two Americans: Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers, who were inspired by the book Psychological Types by Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung. History[edit] Briggs began her research into personality in 1917. Myers' work attracted the attention of Henry Chauncey, head of the Educational Testing Service. Format and administration[edit]
The Myers & Briggs Foundation - MBTI® Basics The purpose of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) personality inventory is to make the theory of psychological types described by C. G. Jung understandable and useful in people's lives. The essence of the theory is that much seemingly random variation in the behavior is actually quite orderly and consistent, being due to basic differences in the ways individuals prefer to use their perception and judgment. "Perception involves all the ways of becoming aware of things, people, happenings, or ideas. Judgment involves all the ways of coming to conclusions about what has been perceived. In developing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator [instrument], the aim of Isabel Briggs Myers, and her mother, Katharine Briggs, was to make the insights of type theory accessible to individuals and groups. The identification of basic preferences of each of the four dichotomies specified or implicit in Jung's theory. Favorite world: Do you prefer to focus on the outer world or on your own inner world?
Personality type This article is about the generic aspects of type theory. For the book by Jung, see Psychological Types. Clinically effective personality typologies[edit] Effective personality typologies reveal and increase knowledge and understanding of individuals, as opposed to diminishing knowledge and understanding as occurs in the case of stereotyping. Effective typologies also allow for increased ability to predict clinically relevant information about people and to develop effective treatment strategies.[2] There is an extensive literature on the topic of classifying the various types of human temperament and an equally extensive literature on personality traits or domains. These classification systems attempt to describe normal temperament and personality and emphasize the predominant features of different temperament and personality types; they are largely the province of the discipline of psychology. Types vs. traits[edit] Type theories[edit] Carl Jung[edit] Four functions of consciousness[edit]
Understanding MBTI Type Dynamics "It is up to each person to recognize his or her true preferences." Isabel Briggs Myers "It is up to each person to recognize his or her true preferences." Isabel Briggs Myers Complete relationship chart between psychological ("personality") types Complete relationship chart between psychological ("personality") types Chart #1 Key to the chart: Usage: Type A x Type B -> Intertype Relationship. Example #1: A = 'ENFp ', B = 'INFp ', Cross-reference result = 'Cnt'.Conclusion: Between ENFp and INFp there is Contrary Intertype Relationship. Example #2: A = 'ISTj ', B = 'ENTp ', Cross-reference result = 'Sp<'.Conclusion: Between ISTj and ENTp there is Intertype Relationship of Supervision, where ISTj is Supervisee to ENTp. Chart #2 Usage: Your [A] is [Intertype Relationship] to your [B]. Example #1: A = 'Qid', B = 'Act', Cross-reference result = 'Ego'.Conclusion: Your Quasi-identical is Super-Ego to your Activity Example #2: A = 'Bn<', B = 'Ego', Cross-reference result = 'Bn>'.Conclusion: Your Beneficiary is Benefactor to your Super-Ego.
Jungian Models applied to global corporations: Kings, warriors, magicians and lover archetypes | stOttilien Recently I attended yet another team building “Engagement workshop”. It occurred to me, while I do understand that this sector in a well performing multinational corporation has rather particular objectives by its mission, why it has such multiple and interesting cultural contexts. Culture is something we all experience, but have great difficulties defining. Personal Layers The cork is tossed about at the whim of the cruel sea unless we get a handle of the nature of the true Self (of which we are only dimly aware, if at all) via the reflective process . Conscious layer The conscious portion of the organization is the public face and its visible set of structure and processes. Mission, strategy and goals: Why are we all here in this organization? Personal unconscious layer The organizational unconscious are clusters of energies, beliefs and truths that bridge between the conscious organization and the collective unconscious. Shhs don’t ask don’t tell Collective unconscious layer Like this:
Table of similar systems of comparison of temperaments Beginnings[edit] The Roman physician Galen mapped the four temperaments (sanguine, phlegmatic, choleric and melancholic) to a matrix of hot/cold and dry/wet, taken from the four classical elements.[1] Two of these temperaments, sanguine and choleric, shared a common trait: quickness of response (corresponding to "heat"), while the melancholic and phlegmatic shared the opposite, a longer response (coldness). The melancholic and choleric, however, shared a sustained response (dryness), and the sanguine and phlegmatic shared a short-lived response (wetness). This meant that the choleric and melancholic both would tend to hang on to emotions like anger, and thus appear more serious and critical than the fun-loving sanguine, and the peaceful phlegmatic. However, the choleric would be characterized by quick expressions of anger (like the sanguine, with the difference being that the sanguine cools off); while the melancholic would build up anger slowly, silently, before exploding. David W.
Personality models and Meta-Data – the Big Five (Eyes) and MBTI | stOttilien This is a short snippet, not an analysis but a warning to watch your friendly data collector near to you and your friendly government’s use of phobias. A paper published in the Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction shows that collected communication and social network trails, may turn out to be of highly personal character if not even of psychoanalytical use. Meta-Data prediction models are not perfect yet, but they have a huge potential. A group of US and French researchers found that personality of the speaker on the phone could be reliably predicted by the way he or she makes calls. What Metadata can do for you The researchers, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, Jordi Quoidbach, Florent Robic and Alex Pentland used the 36 easy-to-obtain metadata elements, which fall into five categories: Basic phone use including the number of calls; Regularity of calling routine; The Big Five Model C. Example Based on C. Conclusion Related
16 Personality Factors The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (or 16PF),[1] is a multiple-choice personality questionnaire which was developed over several decades of research by Raymond B. Cattell, Maurice Tatsuoka and Herbert Eber. Beginning in the 1940s, Cattell used the new techniques of factor analysis (based on the correlation coefficient) in an attempt to try to discover and measure the source traits of human personality (Cattell, 1946)(Nevid, 2009).[2][3] The questionnaire measures the 16 primary traits, and the Big Five secondary traits,[4][5] which have become popularized by other authors in recent years. The test is an integral part of Cattell's comprehensive theory of individual differences. Outline of Test[edit] The 16PF Fifth Edition contains 185 multiple-choice items which are written at a fifth-grade reading level. When I find myself in a boring situation, I usually "tune out" and daydream about other things. Raymond Cattell's 16 Personality Factors[edit] Factor Analytic Strategy[edit]
The Myers & Briggs Foundation - The Eight Function Attitudes As we explore MBTI® type in depth, you will note that each of the eight functions can be expressed in either the inner world or the outer world. Sometimes the same function looks very different in one world than in the other. Here are some descriptions of the functions in each world. Extraverted Sensing: Acts on concrete data from here and now. Trusts the present, then lets it go. Introverted Sensing: Compares present facts and experiences to past experience. Extraverted Intuition: Sees possibilities in the external world. Introverted Intuition: Looks at consistency of ideas and thoughts with an internal framework. Extraverted Thinking: Seeks logic and consistency in the outside world. Introverted Thinking: Seeks internal consistency and logic of ideas. Extraverted Feeling: Seeks harmony with and between people in the outside world. Introverted Feeling: Seeks harmony of action and thoughts with personal values.
Learnng Styles take your test click here to take your learning styles test Information about learning styles and Multiple Intelligence (MI) is helpful for everyone especially for people with learning disabilities and Attention Deficit Disorder. Knowing your learning style will help you develop coping strategies to compensate for your weaknesses and capitalize on your strengths. This page provides an explanation of what learning styles and multiple intelligence are all about, an interactive assessment of your learning style/MI, and practical tips to make your learning style work for you. For ease of use, the page has been divided into six categories: Learning Styles Explained Please Pick a topic: What are learning Styles? What are the types of learning styles? Visual Learners Auditory Learners Kinesthetic Learners What are learning styles? Learning styles are simply different approaches or ways of learning. What are the types of learning styles? Visual Learners: learn through seeing... . Auditory Learners: Their Skills include: