background preloader

7 Lessons From the World's Most Captivating Presenters [SlideShare]

7 Lessons From the World's Most Captivating Presenters [SlideShare]
It’s 7:54 on a frigid January morning in San Francisco. You’re waiting outside the Moscone Center, in a queue of several thousand people, many of whom have been camping out in the cold for over 12 hours. The security detail for this event rivals the Democratic National Convention. Another hour passes before you’re comfortably seated in a giant auditorium that’s crackling with anticipation. Finally, at 9:43 a.m., the moment you’ve been waiting for arrives. "This is a day I've been looking forward to for two and a half years. (Download 20 of the best presentation examples to inspire your next presentation.) Such was the scene on January 9, 2007, when Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone in one of the most captivating product launches in history. As Carmine Gallo puts it in his book, The Presentation Secrets of Steve Jobs, Steve “transformed the typical, dull, technical, plodding slideshow into a theatrical event complete with heroes, villains, a supporting cast, and stunning backdrops.

(3) Anticipatory Systems (don’t) make the news | April 2013 | rosen listserv | In brief. David Ing. On the public listserv discussing Robert Rosen’s work for April, anticipatory systems defined by a journalist reflects incomplete background research by citing Daniel Dubois. The discussion opened with: In a very typical example of how rhetoric, marketing, and computational politics work, the computing industry types have now glommed onto the phrase “anticipatory systems” and are using it to pretty much describe just what RR was *not* talking about in his book of that name. That leads to the article on “How The Internet Will Tell You What To Eat, Where To Go, And Even Who To Date” | Owen Thomas | April 10th, 2013 on ReadWrite Social, with the definition: What Is An Anticipatory System? Judith Rosen responded to David’s forum post: Daniel Dubois delayed the publication of the expanded second edition of Anticipatory Systems, by quite a bit. John Kineman also responded with the comment: Why I enjoy the term “artificial stupidity” — how do we tell it apart from “artificial intelligence”?

Skills4Study.com: Handy Tips Home > Handy Tips > Presentations Having to give presentations is a common component of a degree course. Sometimes, this is a non-assessed exercise in front of just a few people, or it can be an assessed presentation in front a whole lecture theatre. Don’t panic though! For more advice, see also presentation skills and the free audio download on presentation skills. Six important things to remember when you are giving a presentation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Group presentations Do: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Don't: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. For more advice, see working with others. Using PowerPoint Do: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Don't: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. This content has been written by Joan van Emden and Lucinda Becker, authors of Presentation Skills for Students.

Systems Sciences – Google+ Teacher's Toolkit for Shared Learning 20 Years of Hurt? Bus Deregulation in Greater Manchester | East of the M60 It was supposed to have improved services through competition. There was even talk of drivers owning their own buses. Even fare levels were supposed to have fallen, as power moved from the monolithic PTEs and the National Bus Company to the little. How wrong they were, and how right were Greater Manchester PTE nearly 20 years ago. Between 1986 – 1993, there was plenty of competition between GM Buses (then a publicly owned Limited company) and the likes of Citibus, Bee Line Buzz Company and other PTE companies. Of course, there were some improvements to services, with some operators running minibus services via streets that tested the bigger buses. Fare levels have actually increased rather than fell since 1986, except in some cases. Rather than increased services, bus deregulation has seen strategically important routes withdrawn. Over the last two weeks, the Wilmslow Road corridor has become the subject of controversy over competition on the 85/86 routes to Chorlton. Like this:

learning2gether [licensed for non-commercial use only] / FrontPage Webheads in Action ( started meeting at Tapped In on Sundays at around noon GMT in 1998. In the fall of 2010 we began holding these regularly scheduled online presentation events on Sundays at 13:00 GMT, usually in the Webheads Elluminate room at (thanks to a grant from More recently we have expanded the venue to include Elluminate or Google+ Hangout (streamed on )WizIQ (enroll in the Learning2gether course: xxx) and to be presenting on any Sunday or Monday from noon GMT onwardsOn Sundays you might find us in live online txtchat from noon to 1400 GMT here: Please teach us something that you know how to do. See our CFP, and other options in the sidebar at right. These events were initiated to perpetuate the free biannual Webheads in Action Online Convergence events WiAOC2005, WiAOC2007, and WiAOC2009 (see

Heidegger and Deleuze on Death (Nihil Unbound - Chapter IV) 6.1 Who is time? Departing from Heidegger’s 1924 lecture “The Concept of Time” Brassier traces how the question ‘what is time?’ transforms into the question ‘who is time?’ Whatness corresponds to essence (Das Was), and essence (Ousia) is understood in turn as presence-at-hand (Vorhandenheit); being-present. Its two defining characteristics are 1) temporal specificity (Jeweiligkeit) and mineness (Jameinigkeit). In Being and Time Dasein’s being-in-the-world is the synthetic unity of the three ekstases of Dasein’s self-temporalizing: being-already, being-alongside, being-towards: ‘The phenomena of the “toward…”, the “to…”, the “alongside…”, make temporality visible as the “ekstatikon” pure and simple. “Dasein is time, time is temporal. Time-in-itself is meaningless since it would amount to ‘no one’s time’, so Heidegger finally surrendered in his attempt to and gave up on the ontological autonomy of Temporality in favor of Dasein’s temporal ekstasis. 6.2 Ekstasis and ekstema

Solutions Our clients value us as trusted advisors in managing their brand assets. Whether it’s guiding integrated media communications decisions, monitoring brand performance or assessing brand equity, we’re right there working together to navigate the evolving media and marketing landscape. We understand the need for more than data, and we provide synthesis, insight, direction, and innovative thinking. Our expertise spans from communications assessment and media evaluation to brand performance monitoring and marketing accountability. Our rich heritage allows us to combine our deep understanding of consumers with robust analysis to deliver actionable recommendations to help clients reach key business objectives. To read success stories, view case studies.

Related: