Bradley Manning trial: 10 revelations from Wikileaks documents on Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Europe. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning, center, is escorted as he leaves a military court at Fort Meade, Md., on Monday. Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images In 2010, Army Pfc. The 25-year-old intelligence analyst admitted earlier this year to passing documents to the whistle-blowing website, though he denies the charge of “aiding the enemy,” an offense that carries a life sentence or the death penalty. Below is a list of 10 revelations disclosed by Manning’s leaked documents that offer insight into the breadth and scope of what he revealed, help explain his motivation for leaking, and provide context for the ongoing trial. During the Iraq War, U.S. authorities failed to investigate hundreds of reports of abuse, torture, rape, and murder by Iraqi police and soldiers, according to thousands of field reports. Manning’s trial is expected to last through the summer.
Like a Swarm of Lethal Bugs: The Most Terrifying Drone Video Yet - Conor Friedersdorf An Air Force simulation says researchers are at work on killer robots so tiny that a group of them could blend into a cityscape. Science writer John Horgan's feature on the many ways drones will be used in coming years is interesting throughout, and terrifying in the passage where he describes an effort to build micro-drones that are, as the U.S. Air Force describes them, "Unobtrusive, pervasive, and lethal." Air Force officials declined a request to observe flight tests at a "micro-aviary" they've built, he reported, but they did let him see a video dramatization "starring micro-UAVs that resemble winged, multi-legged bugs. The drones swarm through alleys, crawl across windowsills, and perch on power lines. Here's that video (click "hide ad" to play): When I watch that simulation I am horrified. How far ahead is President Obama thinking?
Noam Chomsky: America is accelerating the apocalypse What is the future likely to bring? A reasonable stance might be to try to look at the human species from the outside. So imagine that you’re an extraterrestrial observer who is trying to figure out what’s happening here or, for that matter, imagine you’re an historian 100 years from now — assuming there are any historians 100 years from now, which is not obvious — and you’re looking back at what’s happening today. You’d see something quite remarkable. For the first time in the history of the human species, we have clearly developed the capacity to destroy ourselves. And there are other dangers like pandemics, which have to do with globalization and interaction. The question is: What are people doing about it? There have been a range of reactions. In fact, all over the world — Australia, India, South America — there are battles going on, sometimes wars. So, at one extreme you have indigenous, tribal societies trying to stem the race to disaster. “The Most Dangerous Moment in History”
The Drone War Doctrine We Still Know Nothing About CIA director nominee John Brennan meets with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, in January. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images) The focus on American citizens overshadows a far more common, and less understood, type of strike: those that do not target American citizens, Al Qaeda leaders, or, in fact, any other specific individual. In these attacks, known as “signature strikes [5],” drone operators fire on people whose identities they do not know based on evidence of suspicious behavior or other “signatures.” Despite that, the administration has never publicly spoken about signature strikes. What is the legal justification for signature strikes? The administration has rebuffed repeated [8] requests from Congress to provide answers – even in secret. “How, for example, does the Administration ensure that the targets are legitimate terrorist targets and not insurgents who have no dispute with the United States?” Sen. Sen. The legal debate
Noam Chomsky: Obama Is ‘Running Biggest Terrorist Operation That Exists’ Noam Chomsky: Obama Is ‘Running Biggest Terrorist Operation That Exists’ By Andrew Kirell June 21, 2013 "Information Clearing House - Continuing his streak of fiercely criticizing President Obama’s foreign policy and civil liberties record, pre-eminent left-wing scholar Noam Chomsky told GRITtv that this administration is “dedicated to increasing terrorism” throughout the world via its own “terrorist” drone strikes in foreign lands. Speaking with GRITtv host Laura Flanders about the National Security Agency snooping scandal, Chomsky remarked that “the Obama administration is dedicated to increasing terrorism; it’s doing it all over the world.” He continued: “Obama is running the biggest terrorist operation that exists, maybe in history: the drone assassination campaigns, which are just part of it [...] All of these operations, they are terror operations.” “You are generating more terrorist operations,” Chomsky pointedly said. Watch below, via GRITtv:
How Does the U.S. Mark Unidentified Men in Pakistan and Yemen as Drone Targets? What little we know about the evidence needed to justify a drone strike on unidentified people. Earlier this week, we wrote about [1] a significant but often overlooked aspect of the drone wars in Pakistan and Yemen: so-called signature strikes, in which the U.S. kills people whose identities aren’t confirmed. While President Obama and administration officials have framed [2] the drone program as targeting particular members of Al Qaeda, attacks against unknown militants reportedly may account [3] for the majority of strikes. The government apparently calls such attacks signature strikes because the targets are identified based on intelligence “signatures” that suggest involvement in terror plots or militant activity. So what signatures does the U.S. look for and how much evidence is needed to justify a strike? The Obama administration has never spoken publicly about signature strikes. In Pakistan, a signature might include: Training camps… A group of guys…
The “Rot” Rots On At what point does an organization “rot?” “Rot” seems to be a new phrase du jour being used by the military in the case of several offices charged with mishandling the highly sensitive and uber-responsible job of operating our top-secret nuclear weapons systems. They are the people who literally have their fingers on the big boom button. According to a Guardian report, here’s how this rot came to public attention. “The US Air Force has stripped an unprecedented 17 officers of their authority to oversee nuclear missiles, after a string of failings that the group’s deputy commander said stemmed from ‘rot’ within the ranks.” “Rot within the ranks!” Could there be mental “rot” in the intelligence world that we know is usually anything but intelligent? How about in its assessment of the threat posed by Iran which has triggered a vast escalation of military spending and adventurism with and without the ‘bomb first, justify later’ practices of our Israeli ally whose stockpiles we fund? Read this:
Origins of C.I.A.’s Not-So-Secret Drone War in Pakistan Photo Nek Muhammad knew he was being followed. On a hot day in June 2004, the Pashtun tribesman was lounging inside a mud compound in South Waziristan, speaking by satellite phone to one of the many reporters who regularly interviewed him on how he had fought and humbled ’s army in the country’s western mountains. Less than 24 hours later, a missile tore through the compound, severing Mr. That was a lie. Mr. That back-room bargain, described in detail for the first time in interviews with more than a dozen officials in Pakistan and the United States, is critical to understanding the origins of a covert drone war that began under the Bush administration, was embraced and expanded by President Obama, and is now the subject of fierce debate. The C.I.A. has since conducted hundreds of drone strikes in Pakistan that have killed thousands of people, Pakistanis and Arabs, militants and civilians alike. Mr. As he puts it, “This is just not an intelligence mission.” From Car Thief to Militant Mr.
"Now that the SOB is dead..." "Now that the SOB is dead..."Novel Idea: Asking an Afghan about AfghanistanBy Greg Palast for Vice MagazineFriday, 10. May 2013 "Now that the sonovabitch is dead, why is the US still angry with us?" "Us", in this conversation, are the Taliban. The Taliban’s frustration was relayed to me by Yahya Maroofi, Counsellor to Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai – Karzai's Kissinger, if Kissinger had a soul. The Silk Road nation of Kazakhstan is an excellent place to encounter the dervishes of the Great Game for control of the camel-and-pipeline routes of the Central Asian steppes. Maroofi was spending the day in Kazakhstan’s capital on his way to little-noticed peace negotiations – little noticed because neither Uncle Sam nor Great-Uncle Britain were invited. I am moved to recount a bit of my lengthy talk with the Afghan minister after reading reams of meretricious bunkum about Afghanistan from the pens of US propaganda repeaters pretending to be reporters. “Taliban are Pashtun. Baksheesh. Why?