background preloader

David Deutsch – On Artificial Intelligence

David Deutsch – On Artificial Intelligence
It is uncontroversial that the human brain has capabilities that are, in some respects, far superior to those of all other known objects in the cosmos. It is the only kind of object capable of understanding that the cosmos is even there, or why there are infinitely many prime numbers, or that apples fall because of the curvature of space-time, or that obeying its own inborn instincts can be morally wrong, or that it itself exists. Nor are its unique abilities confined to such cerebral matters. The cold, physical fact is that it is the only kind of object that can propel itself into space and back without harm, or predict and prevent a meteor strike on itself, or cool objects to a billionth of a degree above absolute zero, or detect others of its kind across galactic distances. But no brain on Earth is yet close to knowing what brains do in order to achieve any of that functionality. Why? Despite this long record of failure, AGI must be possible. Turing fully understood universality. Related:  Speculating about AI & its Progress

IBM senses change with its annual “5-in-5” list for 2012 As the year nears its close, IBM, as it has every year since 2006, has pulled out the crystal ball and given us its predictions of five innovations that it believes will impact our lives in the next five years. For this year’s “5-in-5” list, IBM has taken a slightly different approach, with each entry on the list relating to our senses. The company believes cognitive computing whereby computers learn rather than passively relying on programming will be at the core of these innovations, enabling systems that will enhance and augment each of our five senses. View all Touch In the past five years touch screens have become a part of everyday life for most of us, but IBM believes the technology will develop to include haptic feedback so that we will also be able to feel the texture of objects being displayed. Sight Hearing The baby translator created by Homer’s brother, Herb, in The Simpsons will be a reality within five years, according to IBM. Taste Smell Source: IBM

Brain is a quantum computer Predicting The Future: Fantasy Or A Good Algorithm? After failing to predict the Arab Spring, intelligence officials are now exploring whether Big Data, the combing of billions of pieces of disparate electronic information, can help them identify hot spots before they explode. The intelligence community has always been in the business of forecasting the future. The question is whether tapping into publicly available data — Twitter and news feeds and blogs among other things — can help them do that faster and more precisely. Enter a Swedish-American start-up company called Recorded Future. "What we're trying to do here at Recorded Future is figure out a cool way that we can observe the world," says co-founder Christopher Ahlberg. The idea is to give users an ability to see events or relationships in sequence to make it easier to find patterns and relationships that traditional Big Data programs might miss. 'Time Is Often A Forgotten Dimension' As Ahlberg sees it, there are hints about the future everywhere. This isn't a new idea.

Zoek en vind literatuur over terugkerende… Can We Make the Hardware Necessary for Artificial Intelligence? My POV is hardware driven, I do electronic design. I don’t present myself as “an authority” on Artificial Intelligence, much less “an authority” on sentient artificial intelligence, until they are Real Things, there is no such thing as an authority in that field. That said, if the hardware doesn’t exist to support sentient AI, doesn’t matter how wonderful the software is.

Bibliografie frame analysis methodiek Frame Analysis Review Articles Benford, Robert D. and David A. D'Angelo, Paul. 2002. Entman, Robert M. 1993. Hallahan, Kirk. 1999. Scheufele, Dietram A. 1999. Other Articles and Monographs Aarts, Kees and Holli A. Abolafia, Mitchel Y. 2004. Adams, Jacqueline. 2002. Aday, Sean and James Devitt. 2001. Adrian, Bonnie. 2003. . Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2004. Alkon, Alison H. 2004. Allen, L D. Almeida, Paul D. 2003. Althaus, Scott L., Jill a. Altheide, David L. 2002. ———. 2004. ———. 2004. Alvord, Sarah H., L D. Andrews, Kenneth T. and Bob Edwards. 2004. Andsager, Julie L. 2000. Andsager, Julie L., Erica W. Andsager, Julie L., Erica W. Andsager, Julie L., Stacey J. Andsager, Julie L. and Angela Powers. 1999. Andsager, Julie L. Anheier, Helmut and Jeremy Kendall. 2002. Anheier, Helmut K., Friedhelm Neidhardt, and Wolfgang Vortkamp. 1998. Anim-Addo, Joan. 1996. . Appelrouth, Scott a. 1999. Arnold, R. Ashley, Laura and Beth Olson. 1998. Auerbach, Yehudith and Yaeli Bloch-Elkon. 2005. ———. 1997.

Are the robots about to rise? Google's new director of engineering thinks so… | Technology | The Observer It's hard to know where to start with Ray Kurzweil. With the fact that he takes 150 pills a day and is intravenously injected on a weekly basis with a dizzying list of vitamins, dietary supplements, and substances that sound about as scientifically effective as face cream: coenzyme Q10, phosphatidycholine, glutathione? With the fact that he believes that he has a good chance of living for ever? But then everyone's allowed their theories. And now? But it's what came next that puts this into context. Google has bought almost every machine-learning and robotics company it can find, or at least, rates. And those are just the big deals. There are no "ifs" in Ray Kurzweil's vocabulary, however, when I meet him in his new home – a high-rise luxury apartment block in downtown San Francisco that's become an emblem for the city in this, its latest incarnation, the Age of Google. Bill Gates calls him "the best person I know at predicting the future of artificial intelligence". So far, so sci-fi.

Robots aren’t getting smarter — we’re getting dumber Huge artificial intelligence news! Our robot overlords have arrived! A “supercomputer” has finally passed the Turing Test! Except, well, maybe not. Here’s what actually happened: For five whole minutes, a chatbot managed to convince one out of three judges that it was “Eugene Goostman” — a 13-year-old Ukrainian boy with limited English skills. Alan Turing would not be impressed. So, raspberries to the Guardian and the Independent for uncritically buying into the University of Reading’s press campaign. But, the bogosity of Eugene Goostman’s artificial intelligence does not mean that we shouldn’t be on guard for marauding robots. Proof of this arrives in research conducted by a group of Argentinian computer scientists in the paper Reverse Engineering Socialbot Infiltration Strategies in Twitter. Out of 120 bots, 38 were suspended. More surprisingly, the socialbots that generated synthetic tweets (rather than just reposting) performed better too. (Emphasis mine.) Hey, guess what?

How Artificial Superintelligence Will Give Birth To Itself Kinja is in read-only mode. We are working to restore service. "So if you create an AI that has a terminal value of friendliness to humanity, the AI would not want to change itself in a way that caused it to be unfriendly to humanity," he says. "From there, the AGI would be interested in pursuing whatever goals it was programmed with — such as research, exploration, or finance." I think this is a mistake. There are also a lot of things that we know we are inclined to do instinctively (i.e. we do essentially have some programmed "terminal values") but that doesn't stop some people from breaking from those instincts – see for example suicide, killing our own families, etc, which are examples of people going against their survival instincts. Flagged Keep in mind that we're not talking about a human-like mind with paleolithic tendencies. Thanks for replying, I'm not sure if we're in agreement or not though — quite possibly I wasn't being clear in my first comment.

Constraints On Our Universe As A Numerical Simulation Is Our Universe a Numerical Simulation? Silas R. Beane, Zohreh Davoudi and Martin J. Savage This is a general audience presentation of the work entitled ``Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation'' by Silas R. These images and text are based upon a talk presented by Zohreh Davoudi at the Art Institute of Seattle in January 2013. Can AI save us from AI? | Singularity HUB Can AI save us from AI? Nick Bostrom’s book Superintelligence might just be the most debated technology book of the year. Since its release, big names in tech and science, including Stephen Hawking and Elon Musk, have warned of the dangers of artificial intelligence. Bostrom says that while we don’t know exactly when artificial intelligence will rival human intelligence, many experts believe there is a good chance it will happen at some point during the 21st century. He suggests that when AI reaches a human level of intelligence, it may very rapidly move past humans as it takes over its own development. The concept has long been discussed and is often described as an “intelligence explosion”—a term coined by computer scientist IJ Good fifty years ago. “Let an ultraintelligent machine be defined as a machine that can far surpass all the intellectual activities of any man, however clever. Broader and seemingly beneficial goal setting might backfire too. So, what do you think?

Artificial intelligence: two common misconceptions Recent comments by Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking, as well as a new book on machine superintelligence by Oxford professor Nick Bostrom, have the media buzzing with concerns that artificial intelligence (AI) might one day pose an existential threat to humanity. Should we be worried? Let’s start with expert opinion. A recent survey of the world’s top-cited living AI scientists yielded three major conclusions: AI scientists strongly expect “high-level machine intelligence” (HLMI) — that is, AI that “can carry out most human professions at least as well as a typical human” — to be built sometime this century. First, should we trust expert opinion on the timing of HLMI and machine superintelligence? But can we do better than expert opinion? Given this uncertainty, we should be skeptical both of confident claims that HLMI is coming soon and of confident claims that HLMI is very far away. Second, what about social impact?

The AI Revolution: Road to Superintelligence - Wait But Why PDF: We made a fancy PDF of this post for printing and offline viewing. Buy it here. (Or see a preview.) Note: The reason this post took three weeks to finish is that as I dug into research on Artificial Intelligence, I could not believe what I was reading. It hit me pretty quickly that what’s happening in the world of AI is not just an important topic, but by far THE most important topic for our future. So I wanted to learn as much as I could about it, and once I did that, I wanted to make sure I wrote a post that really explained this whole situation and why it matters so much. We are on the edge of change comparable to the rise of human life on Earth. — Vernor Vinge What does it feel like to stand here? It seems like a pretty intense place to be standing—but then you have to remember something about what it’s like to stand on a time graph: you can’t see what’s to your right. Which probably feels pretty normal… The Far Future—Coming Soon This works on smaller scales too. 1. What Is AI?

Related: