Forum Changer d'ère 2020 Après la destruction, les crises, les ruptures et la discontinuité, vient le temps de la « re-création », du renouveau, de la renaissance. L'économiste Schumpeter est souvent cité pour illustrer cette époque de « destruction créatrice ». Mais avant de re-créer, encore faut-il être capable de rompre avec l'existant, de s'en libérer. Ce qui s'applique à l'économie vaut aussi pour les autres domaines : la création scientifique, la création d'entreprise, la création artistique et architecturale. Il faut comprendre toute la portée méthodologique autant que philosophique de ce thème : « ruptures et renaissance ». Qui dit ruptures ne dit pas forcément cassures définitives. C'est en se percevant « autre » avec ses idées propres, que peuvent se construire le raisonnement, le jugement et l'évaluation.
Humans, Machines and Collective Intelligence Tom Malone gave a very interesting talk on collective intelligence at the IBM Cognitive Systems Colloquium which I recently attended and wrote about. Malone is Professor of Management at MIT’s Sloan School and the founding director of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence (CCI). His research is primarily driven by this fundamental question: “How can people and computers be connected so that - collectively - they act more intelligently than any individuals, groups, or computers have ever done before?” This is a very important question to explore to help us understand the impact of our increasingly smart machines on the very nature of work and organizations. Malone and his collaborators are conducting research on a number of topics in this area. To answer these questions they conducted a number of studies where they randomly assigned individuals to different groups, which then worked on a variety of tasks.
CI Resources - The Collective Intelligence Blog Here I share a compilation of contents related to Collective Intelligence. This space is updated with new resources as they become available: Augmented Collective Intelligence: Technology enables all of us to know more than any of us. Scoop.it page curated by Howard Rheingold.Blog de David Sánchez Bote: Explorando los territorios de la Inteligencia Colectiva, la digitalización y la empresa abierta.Blog of Collective Intelligence: Blog edited by George Pór to contribute to the dialogue between different perspectives on CI.Crowdsourcing.org: The industry website on crowdsourcingHomo Agilis (Collective Intelligence, Agility and Sustainability). LINKS ON THE PRACTICE AND THEORY OF COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE Links on the practice and theory of collective intelligence, by Pierre Lévy Some of my favorite thinkers (alphabetical order) Henri Atlan: J. L. Gegory Bateson: Henri Bergson: Gilles Deleuze: Heinz von Foerster: Ibn Sina: Francis Fukuyama: Friedrich Hayek: Leibnitz: Charles S. Plotinus (Plotin): Joel de Rosnay: Michel Serres: Baruch Spinoza: E. J.
Kasparov versus the World It is the greatest game in the history of chess. The sheer number of ideas, the complexity, and the contribution it has made to chess make it the most important game ever played.-Garry Kasparov (World Chess Champion) in a Reuters interview conducted during his 1999 game against the World In 1999, world chess champion Garry Kasparov, widely acknowledged as the greatest player in the history of the game, agreed to participate in a chess match sponsored by Microsoft, playing against “the World”. One move was to be made each 24 hours, with the World’s move being decided by a vote; anyone at all was allowed to vote on the World Team’s next move. The game was staggering. What is particularly amazing is that although the World Team had input from some very strong players, none were as strong as Kasparov himself, and the average quality was vastly below Kasparov’s level. How was this remarkable feat achieved? Microsoft appointed four official advisors to the World Team. Further reading
Anthropology – Discovery of Collective Intelligence | The Unicist Approach to Economics The discovery of collective intelligence allowed building a bridge between the archetypes and lifestyles of cultures and the social, institutional and individual behavior. Individual intelligence is always empowered or inhibited by the lifestyle of a culture which is driven by the fundamentals of the archetype. Collective intelligence is the driver that allows building intelligent synergy among the members of a society to better adapt to the environment. It is easily noticeable in animals, such as ants and rats. Collective intelligence provides behavioral patterns that establish the cohabitation rules of a society and defines who is a member and who is an alien. The collective intelligence is defined by the archetype of a culture and becomes materialized in its lifestyle. Collective intelligence is the intelligence that allows social capital building and institutionalizing. The collective intelligence works as a catalyst and as a gravitational force for individual intelligence.
Modèles de l'intelligence collective des sociétés Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Des communautés intelligentes qui s’auto-organisent, sans chef, qui réagissent instantanément à un message, peuvent communiquer et débattre entre elles : voilà actuellement le modèle standard de l’« intelligence collective » des sciences cognitives. Ce modèle repose sur un principe simple et séduisant : la coopération d’entités multiples aboutit à la formation d’une intelligence supérieure par l’émergence de propriétés cognitives nouvelles. Il est appliqué autant aux sociétés d’insectes (les fourmis), aux neurones d’un cerveau, aux organisations humaines (les communautés), qu’aux réseaux d’ordinateurs (l’Internet). Le modèle des « agents réactifs » : l’exemple des sociétés de fourmis[modifier | modifier le code] Ce modèle standard est inspiré de systèmes informatiques, les systèmes multi-agents (SMA) [1], où une série d’agents autonomes interagissent en suivant chacun des comportements simples. Comment s’y prennent-elles?
The homepage of Roy Lachica Institut francophone d'intelligence collective - IFIC - Accueil Global Futures Collective Intelligence System The Millennium Project is integrating all of its information, groups, and software into a "Global Futures Intelligence System." GFIS* is The Millennium Project’s new way for you to participate with and have access to all of our resources in one place. Those who buy a one-year subscription can interact with all the elements of the system, make suggestions, initiate discussions with experts around the world, and search through over 10,000 pages of futures research and 1,300 pages of methods. The text has built-in Google translation with 52 languages. MP Node chairs and content reviewers will have free access. Introduction to the Global Futures Intelligence System Instead of publishing the State of the Future once a year, the material is being updated in the Global Futures Intelligence System on a continual basis – the same is true with Futures Research Methodology – you do not have to wait five or so years to get a new version. All of this can be computer-searched.
Home - Doug Engelbart Institute Discovering an Integral Civic Consciousness in a Global Age This essay was originally published in the March 2012 issue of the Journal of Integral Theory and Practice. Click here to purchase the full issue. This article asks why, in an age of global crisis, global governance still remains a low priority for the integral community. It posits a civic line of development, suggesting only those possessing a worldcentric level of civic awareness can fully comprehend global problems and the need for binding global governance. I argue that modern (orange altitude), postmodern (green altitude), and even low vision-logic (teal altitude) worldviews still see global problems nationcentrically rather than worldcentrically. Civics entails the rights and duties of citizenship and the role citizens have in establishing, shaping, and overseeing government at any level (Altinay, 2010). If, for example, a citizen could not perceive national-scale problems, or mistook them as being of a merely local nature, she would see no need for national governance at all.
Public Intelligence Blog