LibriVox Comment réussir dans un monde égoïste ? | Mutinerie : Libres ensemble Imaginez que vous soyez illustrateur et que vous ayez un projet de création d’une BD interactive pour tablette. Votre style est sûr, votre scénario est au point et vos planches sont bien avancées. Le problème, c’est que tout cela prendra beaucoup de temps et que que vous ne maitrisez pas les outils de développement nécessaires. La vie nous place souvent devant ce genre de situations délicates et il nous est parfois difficile de trouver la voie. Pour ceux qui auraient oublié, voici le dilemme en question : Deux suspects sont arrêtés par la police. S’il réfléchit de manière rationnelle, le prisonnier se rendra compte qu’il a intérêt à balancer son complice. Autrement dit, la somme de leurs décisions égoïstes et rationnelles n’aboutira pas à « l’intérêt général » des prisonniers mais au contraire à la pire décision possible … Comment éviter ce genre de phénomène ? Axelrod a commencé par se poser trois questions : Tous les environnements ne sont pas naturellement coopératifs.
Definition/It - Definition of Free Cultural Works Versione stabile Questa è la versione stabile 1.1 della definizione. Il numero di versione verrà aggiornato con lo sviluppo della definizione. La versione modificabile della definizione si trova su Definition/Unstable (in inglese). Riassunto[edit] Questo documento definisce le "Opere Culturali Libere" ("Free Cultural Works") come opere o espressioni che possono essere liberamente studiate, utilizzate, copiate e/o modificate da chiunque, per qualsiasi scopo. Preambolo[edit] I progressi sociali e tecnologici rendono possibile a una crescente parte dell'umanità di accedere, creare, modificare, pubblicare e distribuire vari tipi di opere - opere d'arte, materiali scientifici ed educativi, software, articoli - in breve: tutto ciò che può essere rappresentato in forma digitale. Per assicurare il buon funzionamento di questo ecosistema, le opere autorali devono essere libere, e per libertà intendiamo: Identificare le Opere Culturali Libere[edit] Definire le Free Culture Licenses[edit]
digitization vs copyright Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-07-30/Recent research From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost | 2012-07-30 Jump to: navigation, search ← Back to Contents View Latest Issue 30 July 2012 Recent research Conflict dynamics, collaboration and emotions; digitization vs. copyright; WikiProject field notes; quality of medical articles; role of readers; Best Wiki Paper Award Watchlist new issues — Share this [show] Contents [hide] Modeling social dynamics in a collaborative environment A draft of a letter, submitted for publication, has been posted on ArXiv.[1] The letter reports research on modeling the process of collaborative editing in Wikipedia and similar open-collaboration writing projects. How Wikipedia articles benefit from the availability of public domain resources In a copyright panel at this month's Wikimania, Abhishek Nagaraj – a PhD student and economist from the MIT Sloan School of Management – presented early results from an econometric study of copyright law.
¡Copiad, malditos! derechos de autor en la era digital - elegant mob films Definition of Free Cultural Works Definition of Free Cultural Works logo, selected in a logo contest 2006.[1] The Definition of Free Cultural Works is a definition of free content from 2006. The project evaluates and recommends compatible free content licenses. History[edit] The Open Content Project by David A. Therefore, Creative Commons' Erik Möller[4] in collaboration with Richard Stallman, Lawrence Lessig, Benjamin Mako Hill,[4] Angela Beesley,[4] and others started in 2006 the Free Cultural Works project for defining free content. The Definition of Free Cultural Works is used by the Wikimedia Foundation.[7] In 2008, the Attribution and Attribution-ShareAlike Creative Commons licenses were marked as "Approved for Free Cultural Works".[8] "Free cultural works" approved licenses[edit] References[edit] External links[edit]
Copyleft: Pragmatic Idealism by Richard Stallman Every decision a person makes stems from the person's values and goals. People can have many different goals and values; fame, profit, love, survival, fun, and freedom, are just some of the goals that a good person might have. When the goal is a matter of principle, we call that idealism. My work on free software is motivated by an idealistic goal: spreading freedom and cooperation. That's the basic reason why the GNU General Public License is written the way it is—as a copyleft. Not everyone who uses the GNU GPL has this goal. “Sometimes I work on free software, and sometimes I work on proprietary software—but when I work on proprietary software, I expect to get paid.” He was willing to share his work with a community that shares software, but saw no reason to give a handout to a business making products that would be off-limits to our community. Consider GNU C++. Consider GNU Objective C. Here the GNU GPL comes to the rescue. The GNU GPL is not Mr.
Free Data Services Latest update: Linked Open BNB now hosted on a new platform Users can choose from the following options: 1. Linked Open BNB Background The British Library is developing a version of the British National Bibliography which it is making available as Linked Open Data via a TSO platform. The initial offering includes published books (including monographs published overtime) and serial publications, with future releases extending coverage to include multipart works, integrating resources (e.g. loose leaf publications), kits and forthcoming publications. Data Model, Schema and URI patterns The data model for books is available here. The data model for serials is available here. The latest version of the schema has been published here. All British Library URIs start with HTTP and are within the domain bnb.data.bl.uk. Access to the Linked Open BNB The subset of the British National Bibliography, covering books and serials published or distributed in the UK since 1950, is currently available at: 2. 3.
Libre Accès : " Ni SACEM, Ni Jamendo ! " À l'heure où certaines menaces planent sur la neutralité d'internet, des modèles économiques de rémunération de la création commencent à s'affronter. Récemment, l'entreprise luxembourgeoise Jamendo a lancé un pavé dans la mare en annonçant son projet de sonoriser des lieux commerciaux avec de la musique provenant de sa plateforme. Ce projet entre directement en conflit avec la SACEM, qui jusqu'ici, en France était la seule interlocutrice de ces lieux. Nous assistons à une nouvelle forme de libéralisation de la culture, où une plateforme de musique en vient à commercialiser des œuvres en libre diffusion, en se posant comme concurrente d'une société de gestion de droits d'auteurs. Cette attaque d'une société commerciale démontre certainement le grand désarroi d'auteurs qui ne font plus confiance à une société de gestion censée les représenter. Il est dommageable que la politique de certaines Sociétés de Gestion en Europe ne semble pas plus morale que le business d'une startup internet.
Brief History Opening Space for Emerging Order Harrison Owen Open Space Technology, as a definable approach to organizing meetings has been in existence for somewhat more than a dozen years. Truthfully, I suspect it has been around as long as Homo sapiens has gathered for one purpose or another, from the days of the campfire circle onward. It is only that our modern wisdom has obfuscated what we already knew and have experienced from the beginning. In 1985, eighty-five brave souls, or there abouts, gathered in Monterey for The Third Annual International Symposium on Organization Transformation. And different it was. Observably, the operative mechanism was simplicity itself. For several years following, the annual symposium was conducted in a similar fashion. And then, in 1989, Open Space escaped. In subsequent years, the space has continued to open. "Doing the Job" begs for further specificity. It is reasonable to ask, what on earth is going on. What’s the secret? Now back to Open Space.
Free culture movement The movement objects to overly-restrictive copyright laws. Many members of the movement argue that such laws hinder creativity. They call this system "permission culture Creative Commons is an organization started by Lawrence Lessig which provides licenses that permit sharing under various conditions, and also offers an online search of various Creative Commons-licensed works. The free culture movement, with its ethos of free exchange of ideas, is aligned with the free software movement. Background[edit] In 1998, the United States Congress passed the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act which President Clinton signed into law. In 1999, Lessig challenged the Bono Act, taking the case to the US Supreme Court. In 2001, Lessig initiated Creative Commons, an alternative “some rights reserved” licensing system to the default “all rights reserved” copyright system. Organizations[edit] The organization commonly associated with free culture is Creative Commons (CC), founded by Lawrence Lessig.
Open Data Licensing This guide has a new permanent home: This version is no longer guaranteed up-to-date. Please update your bookmarks Introduction This a guide to licensing data aimed particularly at those who want to make their data open. The first section deals with the practical question of how to license your data. Status and Editing This guide is in an 'beta' state with much that can be done to improve and extend it. Disclaimer In addition to the disclaimer in the license linked at the bottom of the page please note that: This information is collected by altruistic individuals most of whom are not lawyers; those who are lawyers are not your lawyers nor experts in your situation. Licensing your Data In many jurisdictions there are explicit rights in data and even where not the situation is uncertain (see discussion below for more on this). What licenses can you use? What Legal (IP) Rights Are There in Data (and Databases) Cf.
Home - AcaWiki Free Culture: Lawrence Lessig Keynote from OSCON 2002 Editor's Note: In his address before a packed house at the Open Source Convention, Lawrence Lessig challenges the audience to get more involved in the political process. Lawrence, a tireless advocate for open source, is a professor of law at Stanford Law School and the founder of the school's Center for Internet and Society. He is also the author of the best-selling book Code, and Other Laws of Cyberspace. Here is the complete transcript of Lawrence's keynote presentation made on July 24, 2002. Lawrence Lessig: I have been doing this for about two years--more than 100 of these gigs. Creativity and innovation always builds on the past. In 1774, free culture was born. These publishers, people whom Milton referred to as old patentees and monopolizers in the trade of book selling, men who do not labor in an honest profession (except Tim here), to [them] learning is indebted. Remember the refrain. That free culture was carried to America; that was our birth--1790. (Audience Applauds.)