background preloader

Demiurge

Demiurge
In the Platonic, Neopythagorean, Middle Platonic, and Neoplatonic schools of philosophy, the demiurge (/ˈdɛmiˌɜrdʒ/) is an artisan-like figure responsible for the fashioning and maintenance of the physical universe. The term was subsequently adopted by the Gnostics. Although a fashioner, the demiurge is not necessarily the same as the creator figure in the familiar monotheistic sense, because both the demiurge itself plus the material from which the demiurge fashions the universe are considered either uncreated and eternal, or the product of some other being, depending on the system. Platonism and Neoplatonism[edit] Middle Platonism[edit] In Numenius's Neo-Pythagorean and Middle Platonist cosmogony, the Demiurge is second God as the nous or thought of intelligibles and sensibles.[4] Neoplatonism[edit] Henology[edit] The Demiurge of Neoplatonism is the Nous (mind of God), and is one of the three ordering principles: Arche (Gr. Iamblichus[edit] Gnosticism[edit] Mythos[edit] Angels[edit] Names[edit] Related:  GnosticismoCreationThe Sorrow of Young Werther by Goethe

The New Gnosticism One of the advantages of living in a city whose airport is a major transportation hub is that there’s a good chance, when on the way to a conference, one will run into others going to the same place. Last time I set out for the Louisville Conference on Literature and Culture Since 1900, I ran across Rae Armantrout in the departure lounge. This year I was nearly knocked over by Patrick Pritchett, the chair of my panel, whose route to Louisville from Harvard took him through O’Hare Airport. Much of what I love about conferences takes place outside the official venues, and, indeed, on my first day I didn’t attend a single panel, but shuffled from bar to restaurant to bar, hanging with the usual suspects (Pritchett & Scroggins, conference organizer Alan Golding, Joe Donahue, David Need, Norman Finkelstein, Barrett Watten, Aldon Nielson, Vincent Sherry), and many more, including Ed Foster and Joan Retallack, neither of whom I’ve seen in Louisville before. 1.

History of the Human Race "The Truth" ~ Ascension Dictionary August 25, 2017 RodrigoA Guardian Alliance (GA) = immense group of beings who reside in a myriad of locations in the Time Matrix. They are a member of the Interdimensional Assoc of Free Worlds (IAFW)AIFW Members consist of Biological (below 7D), Etheric (7D-9D) and Light (10D-15D) beings.Administrators of IAFW & GA are beings of pure immense, meta-maths consciousness. Guardians of the Cosmic Matrix.Cosmic Matrix = Energy Matrix + Time Matrix.Geomantic Entities (16D and above) reside in the Energy Matrix. These entities viewed from 3D would appear as geometric shapes made of living light.The Fall:Earth is in HU-1Tara is in HU-2Gaia is in HU-3 Project Turaneusiam-1 (T-1) Tara Cataclysm Project Turaneusiam-2 (T-2) 550-250 MYA many species where seeded by HU-1 ET’s (plants, animals, insects)... Earth Human Race 1st Seeding 1st Seeding of the 3rd World (25 MYA to 5.5 MYA)5 x C/Races entered earth in different locations. Earth Human Race 2nd Seeding Drakon Invasion Earth Human Race 3rd Seeding

Martin Heidegger Martin Heidegger (German: [ˈmaɐ̯tiːn ˈhaɪdɛɡɐ]; 26 September 1889 – 26 May 1976) was a German philosopher, widely seen as a seminal thinker in the Continental tradition, particularly within the fields of existential phenomenology and philosophical hermeneutics. From his beginnings as a Catholic academic, he developed a groundbreaking and widely influential philosophy. His relationship with Nazism has been a controversial and widely debated subject. For Heidegger, the things in lived experience always have more to them than what we can see; accordingly, the true nature of being is “withdrawal”. The interplay between the obscured reality of things and their appearance in what he calls the “clearing” is Heidegger's main theme. The presence of things for us is not their being, but merely their being interpreted as equipment according to a particular system of meaning and purpose. It has been suggested[by whom?] Biography[edit] Early years[edit] Marburg[edit] Freiburg[edit] Post-war[edit]

Hiérogamie ou Mariage Sacré 1.1 La fascination pour l’Orient Ex oriente lux: c’est de l’Orient que vient la lumière. Cet adage en vogue chez les alchimistes et les théosophes durant la Renaissance, illustre bien la fascination exercée par le mysticisme oriental sur les mentalités occidentales[1]. Cette fascination se trouve pour une large part à la racine du mouvement gnostique, aussi bien dans son expression antique qu’à notre époque. On la trouve déjà présente au VIe siècle avant Jesus-Christ, avec les théogonies élaborées sous l’influence des doctrines orphiques (du nom du personnage mythologique Orphée, dont elles prétendaient tirer leurs sources). Ces théogonies, ou récits mythiques de la naissance des dieux, s’écartent sensiblement de celle d’Hésiode, lequel organisa et classifia le panthéon de la mythologie grecque au VIIIe siècle avant Jésus-Christ. 1.2 Le mythe de Dionysos 1.3 Alexandre le Grand et la divinisation du monarque 1.4 Les religions à mystère 1.5 Les racines judaïsantes du Gnosticisme

1. Our Origins – Videos and Articles by Wes Penre and Ariel Glad This is the story of the origins of humankind. Our souls originate and were born in Orion, and the Queen of the Stars is our Spiritual Mother. She started the Human Experiment in our solar system on a planet called Tiamaat (Maldek by some). This planet no longer exists, but the remnants are what we now know as the asteroid belt. Many Creator Gods from different star systems helped in the process of creating the Experiment. Link to the DESCRIPTION BOX Support us on Patreon or on PayPal! Like this: Like Loading... Related FAQ: Wheels within Wheels and Fate vs. By Wes Penre, Feb. 25, 2020 Wheels of Time In our video section, we have a video termed, "wheels within wheels," which is an old, esoteric term, used in secret societies and built on occult knowledge the Elite possesses. February 25, 2020 In "FAQ" Article #2: The Death Trap and How to Avoid It

Theory of forms Philosophical theory attributed to Plato The theory of Forms or theory of Ideas[1][2][3] is a philosophical theory, fuzzy concept, or world-view, attributed to Plato, that the physical world is not as real or true as timeless, absolute, unchangeable ideas.[4] According to this theory, ideas in this sense, often capitalized and translated as "Ideas" or "Forms",[5] are the non-physical essences of all things, of which objects and matter in the physical world are merely imitations. Plato speaks of these entities only through the characters (primarily Socrates) of his dialogues who sometimes suggests that these Forms are the only objects of study that can provide knowledge.[6] The theory itself is contested from within Plato's dialogues, and it is a general point of controversy in philosophy. Nonetheless, the theory is considered to be a classical solution to the problem of universals.[7] Forms[edit] Plato explains how we are always many steps away from the idea or Form. Perfection[edit] Meno

The Duality of Philosophy tHE dUALITY oF pHILOsOPHY The Etymology of "Wisdom;" The Coiling helix of Time; The 2 names of Mary An alchemical dialectic of history. by Johnes Ruta The Etymology of "Wisdom" "Philosophy" comes to us from the ancient Greeks’ love for wisdom and knowledge, and literally the name means a "lover of Wisdom." In Western thought, the Philosophical principles of geometry and harmony have given us our: 1. guidelines in the recognition of patterns; 2. terms of phenomena we categorize; 3. basis for our understanding of Nature, and physical science; 4. organization of data systems; 5. structure of Western music, and visual design. But the notion of the "lover of Wisdom," in a still-evolving Western philosophical tradition begun by Pythagoras, conceals an even deeper physical relationship between "intuitive knowledge" and the liquid, "oceanic" sexual manifestations of the human body. But the idea of the vision of "philosophy" is never thoroughly abandoned. The Double Helix of Sophia, 13th Aeon

Simulated Order - Jehovah - Yaldabaoth by John Lash from MetaHistory Website Spanish version Assuming the arrogant pose of a solar deity, Yaldabaoth falsely believes himself to be the only god in the entire cosmos. Thus, for Gnostics, the identification of Yaldabaoth with Jehovah of the Old Testament, a deity who suffers from this very complex of cosmic egotism, is a foregone conclusion, prefigured in the Sophianic origin myth. Being blind, he cannot perceive the Pleroma (galactic core), nor does he recognize Sophia, the cosmic current that surged from the core and produced him in the first place. He becomes infatuated, bloated with grandiosity, causing Sophia to feel shame and want to hide him from the sight of the Pleromic Aeons. "She cast him away from her radiance, so that no one among the immortal ones might see him... The Aeon Sophia is that cosmic current whose impact organizes the dema and produces the Archons. Yaldabaoth originates nothing, however. The Lord Archon is called antimimon pneuma, "counterfeit spirit."

World view Worldview remains a confused and confusing concept in English, used very differently by linguists and sociologists. It is for this reason that James W. Underhill suggests five subcategories: world-perceiving, world-conceiving, cultural mindset, personal world, and perspective.[3][4][5] The term worldview is a calque of the German word Weltanschauung [ˈvɛltʔanˌʃaʊ.ʊŋ] ( Assessment and comparison[edit] One can think of a worldview as comprising a number of basic beliefs which are philosophically equivalent to the axioms of the worldview considered as a logical or consistent theory. If two different worldviews have sufficient common beliefs it may be possible to have a constructive dialogue between them.[8] A third alternative sees the worldview approach as only a methodological relativism, as a suspension of judgment about the truth of various belief systems but not a declaration that there is no global truth. Linguistics[edit] Weltanschauung and cognitive philosophy[edit] Folk-epics[edit]

Bogomilism The development of Bogomillism The Bogomils called for a return to early Christianity, rejecting the ecclesiastical hierarchy, and their primary political tendencies were resistance to the state and church authorities. This helped the movement spread quickly in the Balkans, gradually expanding throughout the Byzantine Empire and later reaching Kievan Rus', Bosnia, Dalmatia, Rascia, Italy, France. Etymology[edit] The term Bogomil in free translation means "dear to God", and is a compound of the Slavic words for "god" (Common Slavic: *bogъ) and "dear" (Common Slavic: *milъ). Sources[edit] Much of their literature has been lost or destroyed by the contemporary Christian Churches. History[edit] Paulicians[edit] In 970 the emperor John I Tzimiskes transplanted no less than 200,000 Armenian Paulicians to Europe and settled them in the neighbourhood of Philippopolis (today's Plovdiv in Thrace). Origins[edit] The Slavonic sources are unanimous on the point that his teaching was Manichaean.

LUCIFER (Enki) Begat Second "Adam & Eve", ADAPA & TITI with 2 Girls Descended from the First "Adam & Eve", ADAMU & TI-AMAT; Enki begat CAIN with Titi Excerpted from ANUNNAKI: LEGACY OF THE GODS–Techno-Savvy ET s From the Planet Nibiru Who Came For Gold, Created Us From Their Genome to Work the Mines, Posed As Gods, Decided to Let Us Drown, But Then Decided to Breed Us to Work For Them by Sasha Alex Lessin, Ph.D. & Janet Kira Lessin. Until about 300,000 BCE, Enki, Chief Scientist of the Nibiran (ie Anunnaki) Goldmining Expedion to Earth, went North, to the Great Rift Valley (southeast Africa) to study an intelligent, fire-using primate, Homo erectus. Erectus reasoned, freed animals from traps and communicated telepathically rather than with language. Enki thought Erectus either evolved on Earth from Nibiran genes delivered when Nibiru invaded the solar system or Erectus devolved from Homo Sapien colonists on Earth long before 450,000 years ago, when the Nibirans arrived. Erectus’ and Nibirans’ genomes differed only a few hundred (out of 30,000) genes. Erectus would evolve in a few million years into Homo Sapiens. Enlil objected. .

Anaximenes of Miletus Ancient Greek Pre-Socratic philosopher Anaximenes of Miletus (; Greek: Ἀναξιμένης ὁ Μιλήσιος; c. 586 – c. 526 BC) was an Ancient Greek Pre-Socratic philosopher active in the latter half of the 6th century BC.[1][2] The details of his life are obscure because none of his work has been preserved. Anaximenes' ideas and philosophies are only known today because of comments made by Aristotle and other writers on the history of Greek philosophy.[3] Apollodorus of Damascus noted the dates Anaximander was alive in relation to well-known historical events, and estimated Anaximenes' lifespan as having occurred during the same time period in which Cyrus the Great defeated Croesus at the Battle of Thymbra in 546 BC.[2] Anaximenes was the last known Milesian philosopher, as Miletus was captured by the Persian army in 494 BC.[7] Anaximenes and the Arche[edit] Influence on philosophy[edit] Anaximenes, Aristotle, and Plato[edit] An artist's rendition of Anaximenes of Miletus The origin of the Cosmos[edit]

Le serpent guérisseur et l’origine de la gnose ophite Clément d’Alexandrie, Stromates 7,17,108,2. L’identification du serpent avec le diable procède évidemment de la scène de Gen. 3; Sg. 2,14 est le premier texte à la poser explicitement, mais il ne faut pas oublier les équivalences entre reptile et diable présupposées ensuite par les targumim, comme Targum Ps.Jonathan 3,6 et 4,1. Sur la valeur du serpent dans la culture juive et chrétienne, voir, par exemple, Werner Foerster, « Ophis », dans Gerhard Kittel–Gerhard Friedrich édd., Grande Lessico del Nuovo Testamento (trad.it), vol. 9, Paideia, Brescia, 1974 (éd. originale allemande, Stuttgart, 1954), 23-66. On ne regrettera jamais assez la disproportion entre l’imposante bibliographie sur les problèmes généraux du gnosticisme, comme l’origine de ce mouvement, et la pénurie d’études ciblées sur certaines sectes. Jean-Daniel Kaestli, « L’interprétation du serpent de Genèse 3… », 128-30. Ou Prounikos ou tout autre éon féminin porteur de l’étincelle de sagesse pneumatique. Ibid., cit. 126. Cf.

Related: