Physical Properties of Gluten Hydrolysate
<div class="c-box-warning full-width-element" style="text-align: center; "><div style="margin: auto; padding:10px;" class="container"><b>For full functionality of ResearchGate it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the <a href=" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"> instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser</a>.</b></div></div> Abstract The objective of present study was to study the effect of biofield treatment on physical and thermal properties of gluten hydrolysate (GH) and ipomoea macroelements (IM). The study was performed in two groups (control and treated).
Bio-field Treatment: A Potential Strategy for Modification of Physical and Thermal Properties of Gluten Hydrolysate and Ipomoea Macroelements
Share this: Embed* Cite this:
Evaluation of Phenotyping and Genotyping Characteristic of Shigella sonnei after Biofield Treatment
Abstract Shigella sonnei (S. sonnei) is a non-motile, rod shape, clinically significant, Gram-negative bacterium. It is commonly associated with dysentery (shigellosis). Recently, resistance to third and fourth generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones has been reported in S. sonnei. In the present study, we assessed the effect of biofield treatment on phenotyping and genotyping characteristic of S. sonnei (ATCC 9290). The lyophilized samples of S. sonnei were divided in three groups (G): G-I (control, revived), G-II (treatment, revived), and G-III (treatment, lyophilized).
Evaluation of Biofield Treatment Dose and Distance in a Model of Cancer Cell Death
conducted in parallel that indicated a relatively stable baseline variability in the data output from the modelsystem. However, the interpretation of these results iscomplicated by the lack of replicability observed in thesecond set of experiments using the same model systemand the same participants. Part of the struggle is rec-onciling the centuries of precedent in which the test of replicability has been a fundamental tenet of the scien-tific method, and the acknowledgment that the experi-mental intervention in this model system derives from ahuman being and may thus be inherently changing withtime and situation (e.g., mental and emotional state at aparticular time). Lack of replicability has been a consis-tent element in a series of in vitro studies of various biofield treatment modalities conducted by the currentauthors’ group
Spectroscopic Characterization of Biofield Treated Metronidazole and Tinidazole
Title: Spectroscopic Characterization of Biofield Treated Metronidazole and Tinidazole Select license: Creative Commons Attributions-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
Alteration in Thermal Properties of Ipomoea Macroelements
Volume 5 • Issue 5 • 1000414 J Nutr Food Sci ISSN: 2155-9600 JNFS, an open access journal
Publication meta - Spectroscopic Characterization of Disulfiram and Nicotinic Acid after Biofield Treatment - Publications - MyScienceWork
Disulfiram is being used clinically as an aid in chronic alcoholism, while nicotinic acid is one of a B-complex vitamin that has cholesterol lowering activity. The aim of present study was to investigate the impact of biofield treatment on spectral properties of disulfiram and nicotinic acid. The study was performed in two groups i.e., control and treatment of each drug.
Publication meta - Evaluation of Biofield Treatment Dose and Distance in a Model of Cancer Cell Death - Publications
Objective: This study assessed the potential influence of biofield treatment on cultured human cancer cells and whether such influence was affected by varying the duration of the treatment (dose) or the distance between the biofield practitioner and the target cells. Design: Biofield treatment dosage was assessed from a short distance (0.25 meters) in three independent experiments involving 1, 2, or 5 treatments, along with another set of three independent and comparable mock experiments. Biofield treatment distance was assessed at 0.25, 25, and * 2000 meters involving two treatments in three independent experiments along with another set of three mock experiments. Intervention: Biofield treatments were delivered by a highly acclaimed biofield practitioner with the intention of diminishing growth of the cells or inducing cancer-cell death.
